<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Taking every thought captive &#187; Bible &#8211; NT &#8211; James</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterwhyte.org.uk/captivethoughts/category/james/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterwhyte.org.uk/captivethoughts</link>
	<description>seeking to obey Christ one thought at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:34:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How did the New Testament come to be written?</title>
		<link>http://peterwhyte.org.uk/captivethoughts/2008/04/22/how-did-the-new-testament-come-to-be-written/</link>
		<comments>http://peterwhyte.org.uk/captivethoughts/2008/04/22/how-did-the-new-testament-come-to-be-written/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Whyte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible - NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible - NT - James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible - NT - Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible - NT - Matthew]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://captivethoughts.wordpress.com/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James B Jordan, et al, have been posting an interesting series of speculations on how Matthew&#8217;s Gospel (20 Mar), James&#8217; Letter (21 Mar, by Jeff Myers), and Mark&#8217;s Gospel (24 Mar) might have come to be written. Riveting reading and provocative in the best sense of the word. As Jordan concludes about Matthew: Given how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James B Jordan, et al, have been posting an interesting series of speculations on how <a title="How Matthew Came to be Written" href="http://biblicalhorizons.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/how-matthew-came-to-be-written/" target="_self">Matthew&#8217;s Gospel</a> (20 Mar), <a title="How James [Jacob] Came to Be Written" href="http://biblicalhorizons.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/how-mark-came-to-be-written/" target="_blank">James&#8217; Letter</a> (21 Mar, by Jeff Myers), and <a title="How Mark Came to be Written" href="http://biblicalhorizons.wordpress.com/2008/03/24/how-mark-came-to-be-written-2/" target="_blank">Mark&#8217;s Gospel</a> (24 Mar) might have come to be written. Riveting reading and provocative in the best sense of the word.  As Jordan concludes about Matthew:</p>
<blockquote><p>Given how all these people thought, and the context in which they lived, it should be pretty obvious that the book of Matthew was produced immediately after Pentecost. Anyone who thinks otherwise should come forward with any reason why the apostles would have waited.</p></blockquote>
<p>It certainly makes a lot of sense, despite what many scholars believe. And even if it is apocryphal, there are some valuable insights into the contents of the books. Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterwhyte.org.uk/captivethoughts/2008/04/22/how-did-the-new-testament-come-to-be-written/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
